<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Aslanger Pattern on ECG Library – LITFL Basics</title>
    <link>https://ecgvn.com/en/tags/aslanger-pattern/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Aslanger Pattern on ECG Library – LITFL Basics</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ecgvn.com/en/tags/aslanger-pattern/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>ST depression does not localise</title>
      <link>https://ecgvn.com/en/posts/st-depression-does-not-localise/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ecgvn.com/en/posts/st-depression-does-not-localise/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have had a few people ask me about the following statement from &lt;a href=&#34;https://litfl.com/ecg-case-121-2/&#34;&gt;ECG Case 121&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;“The reciprocal ST depression seen in leads III and aVF (in high lateral infarction) is often mistaken for inferior ischaemia. One must recall that &lt;strong&gt;ST depression does not localise&lt;/strong&gt;, and such ST depression should be assumed to be a reflection of ST elevation in mirror image leads.”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Buttner, Aslanger: &lt;a href=&#34;https://litfl.com/ecg-case-121-2/&#34;&gt;ECG Case 121&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h5 id=&#34;st-depression-does-not-localise--what-does-this-mean&#34;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;“ST depression does not localise” – what does this mean?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h5&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The term “localise” has two relevant interpretations here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
